Collective Impact #ToolBox: Collective Impact Element Dashboard

Collective Impact #ToolBox: Collective Impact Element Dashboard

Finding time to reflect on your initiative’s progress as you go is tough! Dashboards provide a simple way to add some structure to your reflection so you can focus on what needs improvement.

The Collective Impact #ToolBox is a series of blogs featuring simple, practical tools that members of cross-sector partnerships can use to support their day to day work.

As the field and theory of collective impact has evolved, it has been perceived by many as either too esoteric and theoretical, or just a new name for what many felt they were already doing, or a strange mix of both! Collective Impact is often weighed down by jargon and lack of practical details about what high level concepts really mean. At Living Cities we were guilty of the same kind of “over generalizing” for a long time. So, over the last two years we have spent a great deal of time clarifying and attempting to codify what we believe the elements of collective impact entail in application.

Simply put, we attempted to answer the question, “if you are doing this work well, what does it actually look like?

Part of that process led us to articulate what we have learned about the elements that must be incorporated into the effective application of collective impact principles. In addition to the foundational elements of collective impact (which Tynesia Boyea-Robinson has previously laid out), we also looked at two other elements to catalyze change, which we believe must also be present: public sector innovation, and capital innovation.

Additionally, we made an effort to apply a more transparent and disciplined process to supporting our Integration Initiative site partners in cities applying these three elements. As part of that effort, we developed a dashboard as a tool to capture progress against these elements and prioritize resources to move sites toward their shared result. We update these dashboards as a team every quarter and reflect on what is working, what isn’t and why. We then rate the status of each element using a simple red, yellow, green code for where the site partner is in the work, and trending up or down areas to indicate trajectory of progress.

An important nuance to keep in mind is that this dashboard tracks Living Cities outcomes, and not the outcomes our site partners have defined locally to measure progress towards their shared result (such as number of students graduating from high school or residents in living wage jobs). This dashboard helps us determine how well site partners are implementing the elements of collective impact and how we can provide better support to our partners. We believe if the site partners can successfully implement these elements, they will be able to achieve their shared result as defined in their local context.

Like most things at Living Cities, this is a work in progress that we continue to refine as we learn more about what it takes to get dramatically better results for low-income people faster. Let us know what you think about this tool. What is missing? What would make it more useful? What isn’t quite right?

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Latest Articles

How 2020’s “Year of Reckoning” Shaped What Comes Next for Closing the Gaps

In 2020, Living Cities launched the  “Closing the Gaps” Network, paired with a cohort of cities participating in a “Year of Reckoning” initiative. This foundational year brought together leadership in six cities–Austin, Albuquerque, Memphis, Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Rochester–to interrogate how racism has shaped their cities, to organize together to implement policies and practices that would build wealth for BIPOC …

Wealth Beyond Survival

People of color are reported to be on track to become the country’s new majority by 2045. Knowing this, government leaders, private investors and philanthropic funders need to have a more comprehensive understanding of the challenge ahead: For people of color, starting a business, though a risky endeavor–especially compared to the experience of white entrepreneurs–is only the beginning of the …

Supporting and Growing Overlooked Entrepreneurs with Urban Innovation Fund

In 2012, Julie Lein and Clara Brenner started Tumml, an urban ventures accelerator with a mission to empower entrepreneurs to solve urban problems. Through their experience with Tumml, Julie and Clara saw how investors can overlook certain types of entrepreneurs, mostly women and people of color. Building on their experience, Lein and Brenner founded Urban Innovation Fund (UIF) as first-time …

1863 Ventures Seeks to Close the ‘Friends and Family’ Financing Gap for New Majority Entrepreneurs

Melissa Bradley understands how barriers to capital for entrepreneurs of color hurt our economy and our communities. “There is clearly a cost if we do not invest in diversity,” said Bradley, founder of 1863 Ventures. “We miss out on great returns when we are not inclusive in our investment theses. There are opportunity costs for all of us.” She cites …

Get Updates

We want to stay in touch with you! Sign up for our email list to receive updates on the progress we’re making with our network of partners, as well as helpful resources and blog posts.

Name